Theriak-Domino Forum

Dear Doug, thank you for your answer. It is a pity that I noticed it so late. So, now I'm working on another sample. The particular sample from the last question I worked out using the old tcds55 database. However, I'm still facing the same problem working with other samples using the new database. ...

Hello Everybody, I'm facing the same problem as Arthur Santos. I have commented/deactivated all ferric-bearing members of solution models in the database file td-ds62-mp50-03.txt. The bulk composition I'm using in calculations is SI(67.8700490)AL(15.7718330)FE(3.30293480)MG(2.74972460)MN(0.025098770...

Tao, I am using scripts. Here is an example of such a script. Hopefully, it will help. Jacek script.script01d.txt script01d.plt JUN92d.bs 1.0000 300 0.010000 0.1000000E-08 0.1000000E-06 0.1000000E+01 0.1000000E-03 25 25 500 0 SI(61.8085)AL(22.6557)FE(4.9861)MG(2.4803)MN(0.2855)CA(0.6044)NA(2.1119)K(...

Hi Tao,

Look at this thread https://research-talk.org/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=18. There, in the end, there is an answer to your problem

All the best

Jacek

Hi Erik,

thanks for your replay.

cheers,

Jacek

Chris,thank you for your kind advice. It looks as if these two white micas are WHITE_MICA_Ms and WHITE_MICA_Pg. I am a bit surprised as muscovite and paragonite are endmembers of WHITE MICA solid solution. On the other hand in the investigated sample, I have documented both muscovite and paragonite....

Hi everyone, I have calculated a pseudosection for metapelite using JUN92d dataset. Interestingly, in this pseudosection some fields contain I guess two different types of white mica. It is shown by (2) WHITE MICA. My question is how to figure out what types of WHITE MICAS they are? In other words h...

Hi Pierre,thanks for your replay. I'm using the following bulk: 1   SI(66.8367)AL(16.4382)FE(3.1427)MG(3.2363)MN(0.0488)CA(0.5455)NA(6.5557)K(2.7697)TI(0.4264)H(100)O(?)  *  So, if I understand you I could modify this bulk to: 1   SI(66.8367)AL(16.4382)FE(3.1427)MG(3.2363)MN(0.0488)CA(0.5455)NA(6.55...

Hi Alex,

thanks for your advice. I'll try to do this. However, this problem doesn’t exist using different dataset.

Jacek

Hi everyone,

I'm calculating pseudosection using td-tcds62-6axmn-03.txt dataset. Unfortunately, calculated pseudosection looks very strange (see below). Does anyone know what is the problem?

Jacek Sz.