Hi everyone,
I'm calculating pseudosection using td-tcds62-6axmn-03.txt dataset. Unfortunately, calculated pseudosection looks very strange (see below). Does anyone know what is the problem?
Jacek Sz.
ragged curves on pseudosection
Re: ragged curves on pseudosection
Hello,
Local minima related to the LiQ model? Plus labels :)
It is a common proble for me with amphibole / cpx at HP/LT. I would try without the melt model.
Alex
Local minima related to the LiQ model? Plus labels :)
It is a common proble for me with amphibole / cpx at HP/LT. I would try without the melt model.
Alex
Re: ragged curves on pseudosection
Hi Alex,
thanks for your advice. I'll try to do this. However, this problem doesn’t exist using different dataset.
Jacek
thanks for your advice. I'll try to do this. However, this problem doesn’t exist using different dataset.
Jacek
- pierre.lanari
- Posts: 10
- Joined: 29 Oct 2015, 11:45
Re: ragged curves on pseudosection
Hi Jacek, How did you define the number of oxygen in your bulk? I you are using O(?), I suggest you to add a little extra oxygen to avoid minimization issues with the ferric end-members. I would try to calculate the diagram between 550-600 °C and 5000-7500 bar using the following bulk:
1 SI(66.84)AL(16.44)FE(3.14)MG(3.24)CA(0.55)NA(6.56)K(2.77)TI(0.43)MN(0.05)O(?)O(0.001) *
Another thing you could do is to run manually a few minimizations with Theriak in this P-T range and try to figure out what the problem actually is. Pierre Re: ragged curves on pseudosection
Hi Pierre,thanks for your replay. I'm using the following bulk:
1 SI(66.8367)AL(16.4382)FE(3.1427)MG(3.2363)MN(0.0488)CA(0.5455)NA(6.5557)K(2.7697)TI(0.4264)H(100)O(?) *
So, if I understand you I could modify this bulk to:
1 SI(66.8367)AL(16.4382)FE(3.1427)MG(3.2363)MN(0.0488)CA(0.5455)NA(6.5557)K(2.7697)TI(0.4264)H(100)O(?)O(0.001) *
Am I right?
Jacek
1 SI(66.8367)AL(16.4382)FE(3.1427)MG(3.2363)MN(0.0488)CA(0.5455)NA(6.5557)K(2.7697)TI(0.4264)H(100)O(?) *
So, if I understand you I could modify this bulk to:
1 SI(66.8367)AL(16.4382)FE(3.1427)MG(3.2363)MN(0.0488)CA(0.5455)NA(6.5557)K(2.7697)TI(0.4264)H(100)O(?)O(0.001) *
Am I right?
Jacek
Re: ragged curves on pseudosection
Hi Jacek,
Doug Tinkham discusses the issue with Ferric iron on his site (http://dtinkham.net/peq.html) under the section Ferric Iron Problems.
And yes, I believe that Pierre is correct in added a minor amount of O to your bulk.
Doug Tinkham discusses the issue with Ferric iron on his site (http://dtinkham.net/peq.html) under the section Ferric Iron Problems.
And yes, I believe that Pierre is correct in added a minor amount of O to your bulk.
Tyler AmbrosePostdoctoral Fellow
- Salviano Silva
- Posts: 1
- Joined: 18 Nov 2019, 17:03
Re: ragged curves on pseudosection
Hi everyone,
I have a similar problem to the Jacek, however even adding a little extra oxygen the results are still odd.
To the calculation, I am using the tcdb55c2d.txt dataset.
Does anyone know what is the problem?
Salviano
I have a similar problem to the Jacek, however even adding a little extra oxygen the results are still odd.
To the calculation, I am using the tcdb55c2d.txt dataset.
Does anyone know what is the problem?
Salviano